Sushmajee
Mahaabhaarat | Notes
Notes-General | Home | Mahaabhaarat | Notes |
MBH-Facts |
MBH-Facts
Is Bheeshm a rascal? It is my experience that the Defenders of Faith are generally wrong, promoting single track views based more on faith than on reality. Mahaabhaarat (MBH) is not about morality. It is about reality. The complexities of human personality are presented without prejudice. (1) Regarding Gangaa's killing of her own seven sons, shorn of myth, it is part of a pattern of female behavior under stress after delivering a child. It is now accepted in medical practice. It may be called as Gangaa syndrome. (2) Bheeshm was a megalomaniac. As most of us do he had imagined himself an ideal role model. He should display the best filial affection. In other words he should fulfill every whim of his father. His tragedy started from his promise to Satyavatee's father to please his own father or to fulfill the wish of his own father - to marry him to Satyavatee, at any cost. It not only led to the vow of disclaiming the throne but to a very great extent - the vow of celibacy. From then on his life was tragic. He was feeling bound by his word to Satyavatee’s father that he would put her progeny on the throne and protect them also. Bound by this promise, when Satyavatee asked him to produce children from her widow daughters-in-law, Bheeshm clearly refused referencing to his promise to his promise to her father. Besides he himself was not in Satyavatee's progeny. When the matter arose between Kaurav and Paandav,
he knew that Paandav did not meet this requirement either. They were not the
children of Satyavatee - means of Ved Vyaas, or Dhritraashtra or even
Paandu. They were not even the children of any human being, they were the children
of gods by Paandu’s wives. Thus they were not genetically Paandav, that is why
they were also not eligible to sit on Hastinaapur throne. So tragically his pledge
to the fisherman bound him to stand by Dhritraashtra and his children. He had to
accept whatever they did up to the end of his life. Drone poses another difficult type. He was bound
to Dhritraashtra for the "salt" he had eaten of that kingdom. So Eklavya
had to be punished to compete with Kaurav family. Thus to always insist that a
Guru is great, is not applicable. MBH reading needs maturity of a high order. Scriptures
cannot be quoted by ‘parrots’. Hinduism is against being a parrot. It may be tough to
face life alone without props. Two Quotes from MBH About Shruti and Braahman (2) Bhrigu Jee tells Bharadwaaj - "There is really no
distinction between the different orders. The whole world at first consisted of Braahman.
Created (equal) by Brahmaa Jee, men had, in consequence of their acts, become distributed
into different orders." (CE-12.181.10)
|
Home | Mahaabhaarat | Notes |
|
Created by Sushma Gupta On 5/27/04
Contact: sushmajee@yahoo.com
Modified on 12/15/12